Notes
Outline
Plasma Project - Historical Perspective
by
Thomas A. Damberger, Ph.D., CEM
Incinerators
An Environmental Problem
Goals & Objectives
Cost-Effective
Terminate Long-Term Liability
Environmentally Benign
Eliminate Need for Landfill
Long-Term Solution
Ability to Process All Waste
Ability to Recycle
Goal - Identify Technology
  Plasma Pyrolysis
  Incineration
  Grinding/Chemical Disinfection
  Grinding/Microwave
  Electro-kinetic Gasification
  E-Beam/Gamma Radiation
  Grinding/melting
  Infrared Processing
  Laser Beam
Plasma Energy - The Solution
Fourth State of Matter - Not a Blood Product
Most Plentiful State of Universe - 99%
Physical & Chemical Conversion of Matter
Robust & Controllable
Intense, Low-Mass Heat
An Electrotechnology
 Historical Timeline
Incinerator Ceased Operation - Spring 1989
Revocation of Permit to Operate - 8/18/89
Submitted (Energy Remodel Project) Budget $250,000 - 1990
PEC Licensed Mason & Hanger National - 1991
Cost Benefit Study, 15-year NPV $7.7 Million - 11/91
Conceptual Direction Document - 12/91
Senior Management Approval for Testing - 12/91
Historical Timeline
Partnership Development
Demonstration Project Sponsors:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
San Diego Gas & Electric
Southern California Edison
Electric Power Research Institute
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Portland General Electric
South Coast Air Quality Management District
WW Sly, Inc.
$1,575,000 Raised
Permitting the Technology
CEQA Review (California Environmental Quality Act)
Negative Declaration
DHS (California Department of Health Services) 12/93
(Influenced Revision of California Law--1995)
Solid Waste Facility Permit - Exempt
DTSC (Department of Toxic Substances Control) - Exempt
Wastewater Discharge Permit - Modification
Conditional Use Permit - Substantial Conformance
Authority to Construct, SDAPCD - 5/95
Project Team Responses
Dr. Alan Lloyd - SCAQMD
    “Kaiser Permanente should be congratulated for identifying the plasma-arc as one of the cleanest potential alternative technologies to destroy and dispose of medical waste”.
Dr. Michael Eley - Johnson Research Center
“We have conducted a full series of tests and evaluation of the Mason and Hanger plasma-arc system.  The only conclusion that can be reached is that this technology is an environmentally responsible waste treatment system.  The Kaiser system will revolutionize the way society treats their waste stream.”
Project Team Responses
Mark Kendall, CEM - Oregon DOE
“Medical waste and municipal solid waste is an environmental problem that we must eventually cope with.  It is a common problem worldwide.  Plasma pyrolysis is an impressive solution to that problem.”
TB Kurz, President - Sly Inc.
“Your individual effort over the last several years to bring this new technology to the forefront is commendable.  This project is a environmental windfall.”
Invitation to Project Participation
People In Partnership
Utilities
In Partnership With
HI Disposal Systems, LLC
“Serving The Medical & Pharmaceutical Community”
An Invitation to Utilities
People in Partnership
      Investor/Partner (active - passive)
Partnership (public/private)
Separate Company
Merged Entity - Joint Venture/Equity Participant
Project Specific (single/multiple)
Member Project Management Team
Other Discussion Points
Benefits of
Participating in Partnership
Deregulation = Opportunities
Excellent Return-on-Investment
Retain Existing Markets
Expand Existing Markets (Bundled Services)
Ability to Capture New Markets
Provide energy & waste disposal service outside area
No competition - Window of opportunity
Benefits of
A Winning Partnership
Excellent Return on Investment
Environmental Leadership/Stewardship
Diversification of Services
New Market Penetration
In Position to Treat Own Waste
Establishment of New Industry
A Utilities Next Move
Determine Financial Resource Capability
Determine Depth & Breadth of Participation
Determine Type of Finance Vehicle
Time is of the Essence
Opportunity to Partner with Industry            & Take Leadership Role